The Resource A legal and constitutional argument against the alleged judicial right of restraining the publication of reports of judicial proceedings : as assumed in the King v. Thistlewood and others, enforced against the proprietor of the Observer by a fine of £500, and afterwards confirmed by the Court of King's Bench, by J.P. Thomas
A legal and constitutional argument against the alleged judicial right of restraining the publication of reports of judicial proceedings : as assumed in the King v. Thistlewood and others, enforced against the proprietor of the Observer by a fine of £500, and afterwards confirmed by the Court of King's Bench, by J.P. Thomas
Resource Information
The item A legal and constitutional argument against the alleged judicial right of restraining the publication of reports of judicial proceedings : as assumed in the King v. Thistlewood and others, enforced against the proprietor of the Observer by a fine of £500, and afterwards confirmed by the Court of King's Bench, by J.P. Thomas represents a specific, individual, material embodiment of a distinct intellectual or artistic creation found in University of San Diego Libraries.This item is available to borrow from 1 library branch.
Resource Information
The item A legal and constitutional argument against the alleged judicial right of restraining the publication of reports of judicial proceedings : as assumed in the King v. Thistlewood and others, enforced against the proprietor of the Observer by a fine of £500, and afterwards confirmed by the Court of King's Bench, by J.P. Thomas represents a specific, individual, material embodiment of a distinct intellectual or artistic creation found in University of San Diego Libraries.
This item is available to borrow from 1 library branch.
- Language
- eng
- Extent
- 1 online resource (147 pages)
- Note
- Reproduction of original from Harvard Law School Library
- Label
- A legal and constitutional argument against the alleged judicial right of restraining the publication of reports of judicial proceedings : as assumed in the King v. Thistlewood and others, enforced against the proprietor of the Observer by a fine of £500, and afterwards confirmed by the Court of King's Bench
- Title
- A legal and constitutional argument against the alleged judicial right of restraining the publication of reports of judicial proceedings
- Title remainder
- as assumed in the King v. Thistlewood and others, enforced against the proprietor of the Observer by a fine of £500, and afterwards confirmed by the Court of King's Bench
- Statement of responsibility
- by J.P. Thomas
- Subject
-
- Clement, William Innell, -1852 -- Trials, litigation, etc
- Electronic books
- Electronic books
- Freedom of the press
- Freedom of the press -- Great Britain
- Great Britain
- Observer (London, England)
- Observer (London, England)
- Thistlewood, Arthur, 1770-1820
- Thistlewood, Arthur, 1770-1820 -- Trials, litigation, etc
- Trials, litigation, etc
- Clement, William Innell, -1852
- Language
- eng
- Cataloging source
- GMOML
- http://library.link/vocab/creatorName
- Thomas, John Penford
- Index
- no index present
- LC call number
- KD4112
- LC item number
- .T46 1822x ONLINE
- Literary form
- non fiction
- Nature of contents
-
- dictionaries
- bibliography
- Series statement
-
- The making of the modern economy
- The Goldsmiths'-Kress library of economic literature 1450-1850
- http://library.link/vocab/subjectName
-
- Clement, William Innell
- Thistlewood, Arthur
- Clement, William Innell
- Thistlewood, Arthur
- Freedom of the press
- Freedom of the press
- Great Britain
- Label
- A legal and constitutional argument against the alleged judicial right of restraining the publication of reports of judicial proceedings : as assumed in the King v. Thistlewood and others, enforced against the proprietor of the Observer by a fine of £500, and afterwards confirmed by the Court of King's Bench, by J.P. Thomas
- Note
- Reproduction of original from Harvard Law School Library
- Bibliography note
- Includes bibliographical references
- Carrier category
- online resource
- Carrier category code
-
- cr
- Carrier MARC source
- rdacarrier
- Content category
- text
- Content type code
-
- txt
- Content type MARC source
- rdacontent
- Control code
- 60730357
- Dimensions
- unknown
- Extent
- 1 online resource (147 pages)
- Form of item
- online
- Media category
- computer
- Media MARC source
- rdamedia
- Media type code
-
- c
- Reformatting quality
- not applicable
- Reproduction note
- Electronic reproduction.
- Specific material designation
- remote
- System control number
- (OCoLC)60730357
- Label
- A legal and constitutional argument against the alleged judicial right of restraining the publication of reports of judicial proceedings : as assumed in the King v. Thistlewood and others, enforced against the proprietor of the Observer by a fine of £500, and afterwards confirmed by the Court of King's Bench, by J.P. Thomas
- Note
- Reproduction of original from Harvard Law School Library
- Bibliography note
- Includes bibliographical references
- Carrier category
- online resource
- Carrier category code
-
- cr
- Carrier MARC source
- rdacarrier
- Content category
- text
- Content type code
-
- txt
- Content type MARC source
- rdacontent
- Control code
- 60730357
- Dimensions
- unknown
- Extent
- 1 online resource (147 pages)
- Form of item
- online
- Media category
- computer
- Media MARC source
- rdamedia
- Media type code
-
- c
- Reformatting quality
- not applicable
- Reproduction note
- Electronic reproduction.
- Specific material designation
- remote
- System control number
- (OCoLC)60730357
Subject
- Clement, William Innell, -1852 -- Trials, litigation, etc
- Electronic books
- Electronic books
- Freedom of the press
- Freedom of the press -- Great Britain
- Great Britain
- Observer (London, England)
- Observer (London, England)
- Thistlewood, Arthur, 1770-1820
- Thistlewood, Arthur, 1770-1820 -- Trials, litigation, etc
- Trials, litigation, etc
- Clement, William Innell, -1852
Genre
Member of
- Goldsmiths'-Kress library of economic literature 1450-1850
- Making of modern law
- Making of the modern economy
Library Links
Embed
Settings
Select options that apply then copy and paste the RDF/HTML data fragment to include in your application
Embed this data in a secure (HTTPS) page:
Layout options:
Include data citation:
<div class="citation" vocab="http://schema.org/"><i class="fa fa-external-link-square fa-fw"></i> Data from <span resource="http://link.sandiego.edu/portal/A-legal-and-constitutional-argument-against-the/ouPl4DH7_mE/" typeof="Book http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/Item"><span property="name http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/label"><a href="http://link.sandiego.edu/portal/A-legal-and-constitutional-argument-against-the/ouPl4DH7_mE/">A legal and constitutional argument against the alleged judicial right of restraining the publication of reports of judicial proceedings : as assumed in the King v. Thistlewood and others, enforced against the proprietor of the Observer by a fine of £500, and afterwards confirmed by the Court of King's Bench, by J.P. Thomas</a></span> - <span property="potentialAction" typeOf="OrganizeAction"><span property="agent" typeof="LibrarySystem http://library.link/vocab/LibrarySystem" resource="http://link.sandiego.edu/"><span property="name http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/label"><a property="url" href="http://link.sandiego.edu/">University of San Diego Libraries</a></span></span></span></span></div>
Note: Adjust the width and height settings defined in the RDF/HTML code fragment to best match your requirements
Preview
Cite Data - Experimental
Data Citation of the Item A legal and constitutional argument against the alleged judicial right of restraining the publication of reports of judicial proceedings : as assumed in the King v. Thistlewood and others, enforced against the proprietor of the Observer by a fine of £500, and afterwards confirmed by the Court of King's Bench, by J.P. Thomas
Copy and paste the following RDF/HTML data fragment to cite this resource
<div class="citation" vocab="http://schema.org/"><i class="fa fa-external-link-square fa-fw"></i> Data from <span resource="http://link.sandiego.edu/portal/A-legal-and-constitutional-argument-against-the/ouPl4DH7_mE/" typeof="Book http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/Item"><span property="name http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/label"><a href="http://link.sandiego.edu/portal/A-legal-and-constitutional-argument-against-the/ouPl4DH7_mE/">A legal and constitutional argument against the alleged judicial right of restraining the publication of reports of judicial proceedings : as assumed in the King v. Thistlewood and others, enforced against the proprietor of the Observer by a fine of £500, and afterwards confirmed by the Court of King's Bench, by J.P. Thomas</a></span> - <span property="potentialAction" typeOf="OrganizeAction"><span property="agent" typeof="LibrarySystem http://library.link/vocab/LibrarySystem" resource="http://link.sandiego.edu/"><span property="name http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/label"><a property="url" href="http://link.sandiego.edu/">University of San Diego Libraries</a></span></span></span></span></div>
