Coverart for item
The Resource Domestic law in international investment arbitration, by Jarrod Hepburn

Domestic law in international investment arbitration, by Jarrod Hepburn

Label
Domestic law in international investment arbitration
Title
Domestic law in international investment arbitration
Statement of responsibility
by Jarrod Hepburn
Creator
Author
Subject
Genre
Language
eng
Summary
Domestic law often plays an important role in investment treaty arbitration, but how it should be addressed is unclear. Drawing on case law, international law principles, and comparative analysis, this book sets out a framework for engaging with domestic law
Member of
Cataloging source
N$T
http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/collectionName
Oxford scholarship online
http://library.link/vocab/creatorName
Hepburn, Jarrod
Index
index present
LC call number
K3830 ONLINE
Literary form
non fiction
Nature of contents
  • dictionaries
  • bibliography
Series statement
International economic law series
http://library.link/vocab/subjectName
  • Investments, Foreign
  • Investments, Foreign (International law)
  • International commercial arbitration
  • International commercial arbitration
  • Investments, Foreign (International law)
  • Investments, Foreign
Label
Domestic law in international investment arbitration, by Jarrod Hepburn
Instantiates
Publication
Antecedent source
unknown
Bibliography note
Includes bibliographical references and index
Carrier category
online resource
Carrier category code
cr
Carrier MARC source
rdacarrier
Color
multicolored
Content category
text
Content type code
txt
Content type MARC source
rdacontent
Contents
  • p. 8.
  • 4.2.3.
  • Temporal extent of claimant's rights
  • p. 81.
  • 4.2.4.
  • Conclusion
  • p. 82.
  • 4.3.
  • Relevance of Domestic Law Rules on Interest Payments
  • p. 82.
  • 4.3.1.
  • Part I.
  • Reference to municipal legal systems generally
  • p. 83.
  • 4.3.2.
  • Reference to host state law specifically
  • p. 84.
  • 4.3.3.
  • Reference to host state law on interest determinations
  • p. 85.
  • 4.3.4.
  • Conclusion
  • Identifying Domestic Law Issues in Investment Arbitration
  • p. 90.
  • 4.4.
  • Compliance with Domestic Law as a Factor in Remedies Determinations
  • p. 91.
  • 4.4.1.
  • Factors allowing consideration of compliance with domestic law in remedies determinations
  • p. 94.
  • 4.4.2.
  • Domestic legality and non-monetary remedies
  • p. 96.
  • 2.
  • 4.4.3.
  • Conclusion
  • p. 98.
  • 4.5.
  • Conclusion
  • p. 99.
  • Part II.
  • Resolving Domestic Law Issues in Investment Arbitration
  • 5.
  • Ascertaining the Contents of Domestic Law in Investment Arbitration
  • Domestic Law and Fair and Equitable Treatment
  • p. 103.
  • 5.1.
  • Introduction
  • p. 103.
  • 5.2.
  • Domestic Law as Fact in International Investment Arbitration
  • p. 104.
  • 5.3.
  • Tribunals' Attitude towards Domestic Law
  • p. 108.
  • p. 13.
  • 5.4.
  • The Practicalities of Ascertaining the Contents of Domestic Law
  • p. 112.
  • 5.4.1.
  • Guidance in arbitral rules
  • p. 112.
  • 5.4.2.
  • Arbitrators' knowledge of domestic law
  • p. 113.
  • 5.4.3.
  • 2.1.
  • Guidance from international courts
  • p. 114.
  • 5.4.4.
  • Guidance from national courts
  • p. 116.
  • 5.4.5.
  • Guidance from international commercial arbitration
  • p. 117.
  • 5.5.
  • "The Principle of Iura Novit Curia in Investment Arbitration
  • Introduction
  • p. 120.
  • 5.6.
  • Weighting Domestic Case-law and Other Domestic Law Materials
  • p. 125.
  • 5.6.1.
  • Fear of host state manipulation of local case-law
  • p. 126.
  • 5.6.2.
  • No binding res judicata for local case-law
  • p. 129.
  • p. 13.
  • 5.6.3.
  • Resolving conflicts or uncertainties in domestic case-law
  • p. 133.
  • 5.7.
  • Expert Evidence on Domestic Law
  • p. 134.
  • 5.8.
  • Conclusion
  • p. 137.
  • 6.
  • 2.2.
  • Applying the Framework-Preliminaries
  • p. 139.
  • 6.1.
  • Introduction
  • p. 139.
  • 6.2.
  • What Counts as Domestic Law?
  • p. 139.
  • 6.2.1.
  • All host state law, or only fundamental laws?
  • 1.
  • Domestic Law and Direct FET Breaches
  • p. 140.
  • 6.2.2.
  • Any laws, or only laws related to investment?
  • p. 147.
  • 6.2.3.
  • Only laws that are rule-of-law compliant?
  • p. 151.
  • 6.3.
  • Estoppel as a Means to Avoid Consideration of Domestic Law
  • p. 155.
  • p. 17.
  • 6.3.1.
  • An alternative view: the rule of law and investment law
  • p. 157.
  • 6.3.2.
  • Limits on estoppel
  • p. 160.
  • 6.4.
  • Conclusion
  • p. 161.
  • 7.
  • 2.2.1.
  • Applying the Framework-In Practice
  • p. 163.
  • 7.1.
  • A Taxonomy of Errors
  • p. 163.
  • 7.1.1.
  • Failure to appreciate role of domestic law
  • p. 163.
  • 7.1.2.
  • Failure to investigate domestic law sources
  • Domestic legality contributing to FET compliance
  • p. 166.
  • 7.1.3.
  • Failure to engage with available domestic law sources
  • p. 169.
  • 7.1.4.
  • Unreasoned assertions of legality
  • p. 177.
  • 7.1.5.
  • Reliance on improper sources
  • p. 181.
  • p. 17.
  • 7.2.
  • Positive Models of Domestic Law Reasoning
  • p. 182.
  • 7.2.1.
  • Emulating domestic judges
  • p. 182.
  • 7.2.2.
  • Reliance on domestic materials
  • p. 183.
  • 7.2.3.
  • 2.2.2.
  • Reliance on expert witnesses
  • p. 186.
  • 7.3.
  • Conclusion
  • p. 192.
  • 8.
  • Conclusion
  • p. 193
  • Domestic illegality contributing to FET breach
  • p. 20.
  • 2.2.3.
  • Domestic legality as a determinative factor?
  • Introduction
  • p. 21.
  • 2.3.
  • Domestic Law and Legitimate Expectations under the FET Standard
  • p. 26.
  • 2.4.
  • Domestic Law and Arbitrariness under the FET Standard
  • p. 31.
  • 2.4.1.
  • Domestic legality as irrelevant
  • p. 33.
  • p. 1.
  • 2.4.2.
  • Domestic legality as contributory factor
  • p. 34.
  • 2.4.3.
  • Domestic legality as a proxy for (non-)arbitrary measures
  • p. 36.
  • 2.5.
  • Conclusion
  • p. 39.
  • 3.
  • 1.1.
  • Domestic Law and Expropriation
  • p. 41.
  • 3.1.
  • Introduction
  • p. 41.
  • 3.2.
  • Domestic Law and the 'Police Powers' Doctrine
  • p. 42.
  • 3.3.
  • Domestic Law and the International Lawfulness of Expropriation
  • Legitimacy and the 'Backlash' against Investment Arbitration
  • p. 46.
  • 3.3.1.
  • Formulations of the 'due process' requirement in IIAs
  • p. 47.
  • 3.3.2.
  • First set-a textual link to domestic law
  • p. 48.
  • 3.3.3.
  • Second set-'due process of law'
  • p. 51.
  • p. 4.
  • 3.3.4.
  • Third set-due process as domestic judicial review
  • p. 57.
  • 3.3.5.
  • Conclusion
  • p. 58.
  • 3.4.
  • Limitations on Lawfulness: The Effect of the Compensation Requirement
  • p. 58.
  • 3.5.
  • 1.2.
  • Legality and the Public Nature of Investment Law
  • p. 62.
  • 3.6.
  • Conclusion
  • p. 67.
  • 4.
  • Domestic Law and Remedies
  • p. 69.
  • 4.1.
  • Uncertainty in International Law on Remedies
  • Overview of the Book
  • p. 70.
  • 4.2.
  • Application of Domestic Law when Determining Remedies
  • p. 73.
  • 4.2.1.
  • Local failure to act
  • p. 74.
  • 4.2.2.
  • Validity of the investment affecting compensation
  • p. 78.
Control code
973882566
Dimensions
unknown
Edition
First edition
Extent
1 online resource
File format
unknown
Form of item
online
Isbn
9780191827549
Level of compression
unknown
Media category
computer
Media MARC source
rdamedia
Media type code
c
Quality assurance targets
not applicable
Reformatting quality
unknown
Sound
unknown sound
Specific material designation
remote
System control number
(OCoLC)973882566
Label
Domestic law in international investment arbitration, by Jarrod Hepburn
Publication
Antecedent source
unknown
Bibliography note
Includes bibliographical references and index
Carrier category
online resource
Carrier category code
cr
Carrier MARC source
rdacarrier
Color
multicolored
Content category
text
Content type code
txt
Content type MARC source
rdacontent
Contents
  • p. 8.
  • 4.2.3.
  • Temporal extent of claimant's rights
  • p. 81.
  • 4.2.4.
  • Conclusion
  • p. 82.
  • 4.3.
  • Relevance of Domestic Law Rules on Interest Payments
  • p. 82.
  • 4.3.1.
  • Part I.
  • Reference to municipal legal systems generally
  • p. 83.
  • 4.3.2.
  • Reference to host state law specifically
  • p. 84.
  • 4.3.3.
  • Reference to host state law on interest determinations
  • p. 85.
  • 4.3.4.
  • Conclusion
  • Identifying Domestic Law Issues in Investment Arbitration
  • p. 90.
  • 4.4.
  • Compliance with Domestic Law as a Factor in Remedies Determinations
  • p. 91.
  • 4.4.1.
  • Factors allowing consideration of compliance with domestic law in remedies determinations
  • p. 94.
  • 4.4.2.
  • Domestic legality and non-monetary remedies
  • p. 96.
  • 2.
  • 4.4.3.
  • Conclusion
  • p. 98.
  • 4.5.
  • Conclusion
  • p. 99.
  • Part II.
  • Resolving Domestic Law Issues in Investment Arbitration
  • 5.
  • Ascertaining the Contents of Domestic Law in Investment Arbitration
  • Domestic Law and Fair and Equitable Treatment
  • p. 103.
  • 5.1.
  • Introduction
  • p. 103.
  • 5.2.
  • Domestic Law as Fact in International Investment Arbitration
  • p. 104.
  • 5.3.
  • Tribunals' Attitude towards Domestic Law
  • p. 108.
  • p. 13.
  • 5.4.
  • The Practicalities of Ascertaining the Contents of Domestic Law
  • p. 112.
  • 5.4.1.
  • Guidance in arbitral rules
  • p. 112.
  • 5.4.2.
  • Arbitrators' knowledge of domestic law
  • p. 113.
  • 5.4.3.
  • 2.1.
  • Guidance from international courts
  • p. 114.
  • 5.4.4.
  • Guidance from national courts
  • p. 116.
  • 5.4.5.
  • Guidance from international commercial arbitration
  • p. 117.
  • 5.5.
  • "The Principle of Iura Novit Curia in Investment Arbitration
  • Introduction
  • p. 120.
  • 5.6.
  • Weighting Domestic Case-law and Other Domestic Law Materials
  • p. 125.
  • 5.6.1.
  • Fear of host state manipulation of local case-law
  • p. 126.
  • 5.6.2.
  • No binding res judicata for local case-law
  • p. 129.
  • p. 13.
  • 5.6.3.
  • Resolving conflicts or uncertainties in domestic case-law
  • p. 133.
  • 5.7.
  • Expert Evidence on Domestic Law
  • p. 134.
  • 5.8.
  • Conclusion
  • p. 137.
  • 6.
  • 2.2.
  • Applying the Framework-Preliminaries
  • p. 139.
  • 6.1.
  • Introduction
  • p. 139.
  • 6.2.
  • What Counts as Domestic Law?
  • p. 139.
  • 6.2.1.
  • All host state law, or only fundamental laws?
  • 1.
  • Domestic Law and Direct FET Breaches
  • p. 140.
  • 6.2.2.
  • Any laws, or only laws related to investment?
  • p. 147.
  • 6.2.3.
  • Only laws that are rule-of-law compliant?
  • p. 151.
  • 6.3.
  • Estoppel as a Means to Avoid Consideration of Domestic Law
  • p. 155.
  • p. 17.
  • 6.3.1.
  • An alternative view: the rule of law and investment law
  • p. 157.
  • 6.3.2.
  • Limits on estoppel
  • p. 160.
  • 6.4.
  • Conclusion
  • p. 161.
  • 7.
  • 2.2.1.
  • Applying the Framework-In Practice
  • p. 163.
  • 7.1.
  • A Taxonomy of Errors
  • p. 163.
  • 7.1.1.
  • Failure to appreciate role of domestic law
  • p. 163.
  • 7.1.2.
  • Failure to investigate domestic law sources
  • Domestic legality contributing to FET compliance
  • p. 166.
  • 7.1.3.
  • Failure to engage with available domestic law sources
  • p. 169.
  • 7.1.4.
  • Unreasoned assertions of legality
  • p. 177.
  • 7.1.5.
  • Reliance on improper sources
  • p. 181.
  • p. 17.
  • 7.2.
  • Positive Models of Domestic Law Reasoning
  • p. 182.
  • 7.2.1.
  • Emulating domestic judges
  • p. 182.
  • 7.2.2.
  • Reliance on domestic materials
  • p. 183.
  • 7.2.3.
  • 2.2.2.
  • Reliance on expert witnesses
  • p. 186.
  • 7.3.
  • Conclusion
  • p. 192.
  • 8.
  • Conclusion
  • p. 193
  • Domestic illegality contributing to FET breach
  • p. 20.
  • 2.2.3.
  • Domestic legality as a determinative factor?
  • Introduction
  • p. 21.
  • 2.3.
  • Domestic Law and Legitimate Expectations under the FET Standard
  • p. 26.
  • 2.4.
  • Domestic Law and Arbitrariness under the FET Standard
  • p. 31.
  • 2.4.1.
  • Domestic legality as irrelevant
  • p. 33.
  • p. 1.
  • 2.4.2.
  • Domestic legality as contributory factor
  • p. 34.
  • 2.4.3.
  • Domestic legality as a proxy for (non-)arbitrary measures
  • p. 36.
  • 2.5.
  • Conclusion
  • p. 39.
  • 3.
  • 1.1.
  • Domestic Law and Expropriation
  • p. 41.
  • 3.1.
  • Introduction
  • p. 41.
  • 3.2.
  • Domestic Law and the 'Police Powers' Doctrine
  • p. 42.
  • 3.3.
  • Domestic Law and the International Lawfulness of Expropriation
  • Legitimacy and the 'Backlash' against Investment Arbitration
  • p. 46.
  • 3.3.1.
  • Formulations of the 'due process' requirement in IIAs
  • p. 47.
  • 3.3.2.
  • First set-a textual link to domestic law
  • p. 48.
  • 3.3.3.
  • Second set-'due process of law'
  • p. 51.
  • p. 4.
  • 3.3.4.
  • Third set-due process as domestic judicial review
  • p. 57.
  • 3.3.5.
  • Conclusion
  • p. 58.
  • 3.4.
  • Limitations on Lawfulness: The Effect of the Compensation Requirement
  • p. 58.
  • 3.5.
  • 1.2.
  • Legality and the Public Nature of Investment Law
  • p. 62.
  • 3.6.
  • Conclusion
  • p. 67.
  • 4.
  • Domestic Law and Remedies
  • p. 69.
  • 4.1.
  • Uncertainty in International Law on Remedies
  • Overview of the Book
  • p. 70.
  • 4.2.
  • Application of Domestic Law when Determining Remedies
  • p. 73.
  • 4.2.1.
  • Local failure to act
  • p. 74.
  • 4.2.2.
  • Validity of the investment affecting compensation
  • p. 78.
Control code
973882566
Dimensions
unknown
Edition
First edition
Extent
1 online resource
File format
unknown
Form of item
online
Isbn
9780191827549
Level of compression
unknown
Media category
computer
Media MARC source
rdamedia
Media type code
c
Quality assurance targets
not applicable
Reformatting quality
unknown
Sound
unknown sound
Specific material designation
remote
System control number
(OCoLC)973882566

Library Locations

    • Pardee Legal Research CenterBorrow it
      5998 Alcalá Park, San Diego, CA, 92110-2492, US
      32.771471 -117.187496
Processing Feedback ...